(More) Proof Our "Founding Fathers" Wanted A WHITE America

I found this this morning while searching for some good news for todays post...

(From The Western Safeguards Initiative site).

Proof: Our Founders Wanted a White America


Re: president George W. Bush's guest-worker plan [January 2004] to allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in America:

How did our Founding Fathers feel about the matter of 'who can become a citizen of America?' Let's take a look:

Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104):

"That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law court of record, in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good character..."

It is clear that our Founders wanted a White America, not an America full of Browns, Blacks, Asians and Jews. In fact, America's 'only-Whites-are-American-citizens-with-full-rights' feature did not end until the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Notice that the requirement of needing to be White to be a citizen is gone. In other words, up until 1868 only Whites were 'real' citizens of America.

If our Founders had wanted America to be a racial melting-pot, why did they insist on Whiteness as a criteria for citizenship? Our media and our popular-culture directors know that America was intended to be a White country, which is why they malign anyone who suggests otherwise.

(Special thanks to The Vanguard News Network.)

And here is todays installment of...

"BRAINWASHING: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics"

CHAPTER IV: State Goals for the Individual and the Masses
Just as we would consider an individual to be ill, whose organs, each one, had a different goal from the rest, so we consider the individuals and the State to be ill where goals are not rigorously codified and enforced.

There are those who, in less enlightened times, gave Man to believe that pals should be personally sought and held, and that, indeed, Mans entire impulse toward higher things stemmed from Freedom. We must remember that the same peoples who embraced this philosophy also continued in Man the myth of spiritual existence.

All goals proceed from duress. Life is a continuous escape from pain. Without the threat of punishment there can be no gain. Without duress and command there can be no alignment of bodily functions. Without rigorous and forthright control, the State can achieve no goals.

Goals of the State should be formulated by the State for the obedience and concurrence of the individuals within that State. A State without goals so formulated is a sick State. A State without the power and forthright wish to enforce its goals is a sick State.

When an order is issued by the Communist State, and it is not obeyed, a sickness will ensue. Where obedience fails, the masses suffer.

State goals depend upon loyalty and obedience for their accomplishment. When one discovers a State goal to be interrupted, one discovers inevitably that there has been an interposition of self- willedness, of greed, of idleness, or of rugged individualism and self- centered initiative. 'I he interruption of a State goal will be discovered to have been the work of a person whose disloyalty and disobedience is the direct result of his own misalignment with life.

It is not always necessary to remove the individual. It is possible to remove his self-willed tendencies in order to effect an improvement in the goals and gains of the whole. The technologies of Psychopolitics are graduated upon a scale that starts somewhat above the removal of the individual himself, concerning itself first with the removal of those tendencies that bring about his lack of cooperation.

It is not enough for the State to have goals. These goals, once put Forward, depend for their completion upon the loyalty and obedience of the workers. These, engaged for the most part in hard labors, have little time for idle speculation, which is good. But, above them, unfortunately, there must be foremen in one or another position, any one of whom might be sufficiently idle and lacking in physical occupation to cause some disaffecting independence in his conduct and behavior. Psychopolitics remedies this tendency toward disaffection when it supplants and overrides the common persuasions of the immediate superiors of the person in question.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We are in the midst of turbulent times for our People. Much hangs in the balance here, I know that more and more are awakening to these facts and are just looking for ways that they, too, can assist in implementing the changes that will ensure our People a place on this earth for future generations.
I thank you all (THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE WHITE!!!) for coming to WHITESPEECH. I endeavor to help increase your racial awareness/education, and I hope to continue to make this a place where you will return.

In The Awakening of White America, (THE WHITE WORLD!!!), WOLF 14/88!!!
Obviously...ALL SWEDES ARE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THEIR COUNTRY BEING GIVEN AWAY AND/OR SUBVERTED/PERVERTED BY HOOKNOSES+THEIR CAUCASIAN CRONIES!!!...Damned "Neo-Nazi Creeps"!!!
More>>>HERE,
And>>>HERE.